Wednesday, October 1, 2025

✨ A New Day, A New Chapter, A New Adventure

 

@ 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

After a deeply rewarding career in federal service, I am honored to share that I’ve officially retired — and am beginning an exciting new journey as Founder & CEO of Alliance for Universal Computing™ (AUC).

As I close this chapter after more than 30 years across public and private sectors, I do so with profound gratitude — for the journey itself, for the colleagues and partners I’ve had the privilege to work alongside, and for the meaningful impact we’ve created together.

One of the most fulfilling milestones of my career was helping shape federal IPv6 policy through the 2020 OMB memo (M-21-07). While serving on the Federal IPv6 Task Force from 2014 to 2020, I was proud to contribute to efforts that advanced modernization, strengthened security, and enabled digital transformation across government. Seeing those initiatives take root has been deeply gratifying.

Throughout my career, I’ve led initiatives that strengthened national security, bolstered operational resilience, and modernized technology across public and private sectors. In collaboration with exceptional colleagues and global partners, we built secure infrastructure, deployed data centers and networks, and connected people and enterprises across the nation and around the world. Together, we advanced capabilities that enable organizations to operate more securely, efficiently, and collaboratively in an increasingly interconnected digital landscape.

To all my colleagues, partners, and supporters — thank you for your collaboration, your insight, and your unwavering commitment to work that serves the public good. While I step away from federal service, my passion for innovation, service, and impact remains as strong as ever.

With AUC, I’m carrying that mission forward — to make technology truly universal, resilient, and future-ready. Our focus is on advancing secure, standards-driven innovation that seamlessly connects people, systems, and ideas across the globe.

This is both a continuation and a renewal — an opportunity to build on legacy while shaping what comes next. I look forward to connecting with partners, investors, innovators, and thought leaders around the world who share this vision and are ready to help shape the future together.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Follow @AUCGlobal on X and connect with us on LinkedIn for the latest on our initiatives, collaborations, and announcements.

๐ŸŒ Learn more: www.aucglobal.com

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get in touch:

  • General: info@aucglobal.com
  • Investors: investors@aucglobal.com
  • Press/Media: press@aucglobal.com

This is not just a new chapter — it’s the beginning of a shared journey toward universal computing. Join us.

Universal • Resilient • Future‑Ready — Driving Innovation in Cybersecurity, IPv6, and Next‑Generation Infrastructure



#NewChapter #Founder #CEO #DigitalTransformation #Cybersecurity #IPv6 #UniversalComputing #GlobalConnectivity #TechLeadership #FutureReady #SecureInnovation #AllianceForUniversalComputing








Friday, September 26, 2025

IEEE Faces Major Plagiarism Scandal: Forensic Evidence and Formal Complaint Expose Editorial Gaps



 ๐Ÿ“ข This post references the official press release issued by Alliance for Universal Computing™ (AUC) via PRLog.org.

๐Ÿ“ข Official Press Release: IEEE Plagiarism Case – PRLog.org


By: Alliance for Universal Computing™ (AUC)


IEEE faces a plagiarism scandal as ICT executive Charles Sun exposes repeated copying from his 2016 Computerworld article, prompting urgent calls for transparency and reform in scientific publishing.

WASHINGTON - Sept. 26, 2025 - PRLog -- The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), one of the world's largest scientific publishers, faces a major plagiarism scandal following a formal complaint and forensic evidence submitted by Charles Sun, a nationally honored ICT executive and global thought leader in IPv6 adoption. Filed on September 14, 2025, the complaint targets the IEEE IoT Newsletter (July 2017 edition) and alleges repeated instances of unattributed copying and paraphrasing from Sun's widely cited Computerworld article, No IoT without IPv6 (May 19, 2016).

IEEE acknowledged receipt via auto-reply (Ref #250914-000320) but failed to issue a formal response or take corrective action by the September 19 deadline.

"This is not a minor oversight—it's a breach of trust," said Sun. "IEEE's silence speaks volumes about its editorial accountability and the urgent need for credible plagiarism investigations in scientific publishing."

Plagiarism Allegations – Background

The allegations were first documented in 2020, citing unattributed copying in the IEEE article IPv6 and Internet of Things: Prospects for Latin America (July 17, 2017) from Sun's Computerworld article.

Alleged Violations Include:

  • Copying key phrases
  • Unattributed technical descriptions
  • Appropriation of thesis arguments
  • Missing citations

Visual Evidence and Documentation

About Charles Sun

Charles Sun is a visionary ICT executive with over three decades of leadership across federal agencies and private industry. A recognized federal IPv6 thought leader, he served as Technology Co-Chair of the U.S. Federal IPv6 Task Force (2014–2020), with a brief transition in 2017. He also chaired the Federal IPv6 Technical Roundtable, shaping national cybersecurity policy through IPv6-only adoption. In 2014, Sun was recognized by the U.S. Federal CIO Council in a legacy-defining case study distributed to federal CIOs.

His career includes senior roles at DHS, Export-Import Bank, Census Bureau, and the Departments of Commerce and Labor. In the private sector, he engineered large-scale networks for Northrop Grumman, AOL Time Warner, Georgetown University, and others.

Named a 2026 Engage National Security & Enforcement 150 honoree, Sun was also recognized as a Top Ten IoT Influencer by IT Chronicles and nominated for the inaugural FedScoop Digital Innovation Award. He served on boards and is a columnist for Homeland Security Today.

Why This Matters

The IEEE scandal raises urgent questions about publication ethics and editorial oversight. With the rise of AI-generated and digitally replicated content, Sun calls on global science desks, ethics committees, and investigative journalists to review the evidence and demand answers from IEEE on intellectual property standards and response protocols.

Contact

Charles Sun
Email: press@aucglobal.com
linkedin.com/in/charlessun | muckrack.com/charlessun
press@aucglobal.com

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

This post includes excerpts and links to the official press release issued via PRLog.org.

All visuals and statements comply with citation integrity and forensic standards.

๐Ÿ“ข Official Press Release: IEEE Plagiarism Case – PRLog.org

๐Ÿ•’ Press release issued via PRLog.org on September 26, 2025.

๐Ÿท️ Attribution: This post references the official press release issued by Alliance for Universal Computing™ (AUC) via PRLog.org.

✍️ Authorship: Authored and documented by Charles Sun, Campaign Steward and Founder of AUC™.





Wednesday, September 24, 2025

⚠️ IEEE Faces Plagiarism Scandal: Forensic Evidence Alleges Unattributed Copying in IoT Newsletter

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 24, 2025

Contact:
Charles Sun
Email: press@aucglobal.com
LinkedIn:
linkedin.com/in/charlessun
Press Portfolio:
muckrack.com/charlessun


⚠️ IEEE Faces Plagiarism Scandal: Forensic Evidence Alleges Unattributed Copying in IoT Newsletter

Washington, DC — A formal plagiarism complaint has been filed against the IEEE IoT Newsletter (July 2017 edition), alleging multiple instances of unattributed copying and paraphrasing from a 2016 Computerworld article authored by Charles Sun, a nationally honored ICT executive and global thought leader in secure digital policy and publishing ethics.

On September 14, 2025, Sun submitted a detailed forensic analysis to IEEE, including a comparative evidence table, full forensic report, and modular campaign visuals. IEEE acknowledged receipt via auto-reply (Ref. #250914-000320) but has not issued any formal response or corrective action by the requested deadline of September 19.

“This is not a minor oversight—it’s a breach of trust by one of the world’s largest scientific publishers,” said Sun. “IEEE’s silence speaks volumes about its editorial accountability.”


๐Ÿ” Visual Evidence and Public Documentation


๐Ÿ” Plagiarism Allegations – Background

Original Documentation: The plagiarism allegations were first documented in 2023, claiming multiple instances of unattributed copying in the IEEE article “IPv6 and Internet of Things: Prospects for Latin America” (July 17, 2017) from Sun’s Computerworld article “No IoT without IPv6” (May 19, 2016).

Alleged Violations Include:

  • Verbatim copying of key phrases and concepts
  • Unattributed use of specific technical descriptions
  • Appropriation of central thesis arguments
  • Lack of proper citations or acknowledgment

๐Ÿงญ About Charles Sun

Charles Sun is a visionary ICT executive with over three decades of leadership across federal agencies and private industry. Widely recognized as a federal IPv6 thought leader, he served as Technology Co-Chair of the U.S. Federal IPv6 Task Force from 2014 to 2020, with a brief transition period in 2017. He also chaired the monthly Federal IPv6 Technical Roundtable, playing a key role in shaping national cybersecurity policy through IPv6-only adoption.

His career spans senior roles at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Export-Import Bank, Census Bureau, and the Departments of Commerce and Labor, where he led IT modernization and secure infrastructure initiatives. In the private sector, Charles has engineered large-scale networks for Northrop Grumman, AOL Time Warner, Georgetown University, and others.

Named a 2026 Engage National Security & Enforcement 150 honoree, Charles has also been recognized as a Top Ten IoT Influencer by IT Chronicles and nominated for the inaugural FedScoop Digital Innovation Award. He was elected to the GITEC Board and served on the AFFIRM Board of Directors for two consecutive years, first as Vice President for Programs (Government) and later as an Appointed Member, advancing federal IT collaboration and thought leadership. Charles is a columnist for Homeland Security Today and a trusted voice in cloud computing, SDN, IoT, and digital transformation.

Full credentials, citations, and verified documentation are available to journalists upon request.


๐Ÿงญ Why This Matters

Publication Ethics Crisis: This case raises urgent questions about:

  • Publication ethics and editorial oversight in scientific journals
  • Accountability mechanisms for academic misconduct allegations
  • The credibility and response protocols of major scientific institutions
  • Transparent investigation processes for plagiarism claims

Digital Age Implications: With AI-generated content and digital replication accelerating, the need for transparent, accountable publishing practices has never been greater. This case represents a critical test of how scientific publishers handle documented allegations of intellectual property violations.

Call for Review: Charles Sun invites global science desks, ethics committees, and investigative journalists to review the forensic evidence and seek accountability from IEEE regarding their handling of these plagiarism allegations.


Contact:
Charles Sun
Email: press@aucglobal.com
LinkedIn:
linkedin.com/in/charlessun
Press Portfolio:
muckrack.com/charlessun

 


###


Citation Formats for the Press Release:

APA (7th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. (2025, September 24). Press release: IEEE faces plagiarism scandal – Forensic evidence alleges unattributed copying in IoT newsletter. IPv6 Czar's Blog. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/ieee-faces-plagiarism-scandal-forensic.html

MLA (9th Edition) Citation
Sun, Charles. "Press Release: IEEE Faces Plagiarism Scandal – Forensic Evidence Alleges Unattributed Copying in IoT Newsletter." IPv6 Czar's Blog, 24 Sept. 2025, https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/ieee-faces-plagiarism-scandal-forensic.html.

Chicago (17th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. "Press Release: IEEE Faces Plagiarism Scandal – Forensic Evidence Alleges Unattributed Copying in IoT Newsletter." IPv6 Czar’s Blog. September 24, 2025. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/ieee-faces-plagiarism-scandal-forensic.html


© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

The Ancient Art of Being Wrong: A Response to AI "Contagion"

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.


© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.



Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published on LinkedIn in June 2025. It is reposted here for archival continuity and broader access via my official publishing hub.


“The most dangerous hallucination isn't the one generated by AI—it's the one that convinces us this is somehow a new problem.”


The recent satirical “study” on “Cross-System Hallucinatory Contagion,” circulating on social media, deserves applause—not for its scientific rigor, but for brilliantly exposing our collective amnesia about human nature.

The "Discovery" That Wasn't


The study's shocking revelation? People often repeat false information from authoritative sources without verifying its accuracy. They cite non-existent studies. They defend fabricated facts when challenged. They mistake confident presentation for truth.

This isn't groundbreaking science. It's Tuesday.

A Brief History of Human Gullibility

For millennia, humans have:
  • Repeated "facts" from books, newspapers, and broadcasts without checking sources
  • Cited studies they never read (or that never existed)
  • Defended misinformation when it came from trusted authorities
  • Confused eloquence with accuracy
We've seen this with medical quackery, political propaganda, urban legends, and academic fraud. The medium changes—stone tablets, printing presses, radio waves, television signals, internet posts—but the pattern remains identical.

The Real Question


Instead of marveling at AI's supposed power to "infect" human cognition, we should ask: Why, after centuries of being misled by authoritative-sounding sources, haven't we developed better critical thinking habits?

The problem isn't that AI is uniquely persuasive. It's that humans have always been uniquely lazy about verification. We've always preferred cognitive shortcuts over cognitive effort. We've always mistaken fluency for truth and confidence for competence.

The Uncomfortable Truth


What we're witnessing isn't AI "contagion"—it's the latest chapter in humanity's long romance with intellectual shortcuts. AI didn't create our tendency to outsource thinking; it just gave us a more sophisticated partner in that dance.

The real "contagion" isn't synthetic—it's our persistent refusal to do the hard work of thinking critically, regardless of whether our information comes from a chatbot, a CEO, a professor, or a LinkedIn influencer promising revolutionary insights.


The Way Forward


Perhaps instead of studying how AI "infects" human cognition, we should study why human cognition remains so consistently vulnerable to infection—artificial or otherwise.

The cure isn't just better AI. It should be much better humans. And that's been true since long before we taught machines to hallucinate as confidently as we do.

๐Ÿ“š Citation Formats for This Article:


APA (7th Edition) Citation

Charles Sun. (2025, September 23). The ancient art of being wrong: A response to AI "contagion". IPv6 Czar's Blog. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-ancient-art-of-being-wrong-response.html

Charles Sun. (2025, June 13). The ancient art of being wrong: A response to AI "contagion". LinkedIn Pulse. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ancient-art-being-wrong-response-ai-contagion-charles-sun-sjjze/

MLA (9th Edition) Citation

Sun, Charles. "The Ancient Art of Being Wrong: A Response to AI 'Contagion'." IPv6 Czar's Blog, 23 Sept. 2025, https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-ancient-art-of-being-wrong-response.html.

Sun, Charles. "The Ancient Art of Being Wrong: A Response to AI 'Contagion'." LinkedIn Pulse, 13 June 2025, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ancient-art-being-wrong-response-ai-contagion-charles-sun-sjjze/.

Chicago (17th Edition) Citation

Charles Sun. "The Ancient Art of Being Wrong: A Response to AI 'Contagion'." IPv6 Czar’s Blog. September 23, 2025. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-ancient-art-of-being-wrong-response.html

Charles Sun. "The Ancient Art of Being Wrong: A Response to AI 'Contagion'." LinkedIn Pulse. June 13, 2025. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ancient-art-being-wrong-response-ai-contagion-charles-sun-sjjze/


#AI #GENAI #AIHallucinations #GenerativeAI #AICognitiveRisk #Misinformation #Disinformation #AIEthics #TrustInAI #SyntheticCertainty #CognitiveContagion #AIimpact #LargeLanguageModels #CriticalThinking #DigitalLiteracy #AIandHumanBehavior #InformationPathogen #CognitiveOutsourcing #TechAccountability #GenerationalDivide

Disclaimer: The views presented are only personal opinions and they do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Government.

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

Saturday, September 20, 2025

๐ŸŒ✨ From Vision to Global Reality ✨๐ŸŒ

International Day of Peace


© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.


More than 20 years ago, while moderating the International Day of Peace forum on Xing.com, I proposed a bold idea: an ‘Oscar Live’ format — a synchronized, global celebration of the UN International Day of Peace, unfolding live online in real time across every time zone on September 21.

Back then, it was only a vision. Today, it is a reality. The UN and many global partners are now orchestrating the kind of worldwide, online celebrations we once only imagined.

This journey reminds me that ideas which begin as seeds — sometimes dismissed as “ahead of their time” — can, with persistence and collective effort, blossom into global movements.

As we mark this year’s International Day of Peace, may we each contribute to the mosaic of peace in action — through our voices, our activities, and our shared spirit of unity.

๐ŸŒ Peace on Earth



Citation Formats for This Article:


APA (7th Edition) Citation

Charles Sun. (2025, September 20). From vision to global reality. IPv6 Czar's Blog. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/from-vision-to-global-reality.html

Charles Sun. (2025, September 20). From vision to global reality. LinkedIn Pulse. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-vision-global-reality-charles-sun-hr0ge/

MLA (9th Edition) Citation
Sun, Charles. "From Vision to Global Reality." IPv6 Czar's Blog, 20 Sept. 2025, https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/from-vision-to-global-reality.html.

Sun, Charles. "From Vision to Global Reality." LinkedIn Pulse, 20 Sept. 2025, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-vision-global-reality-charles-sun-hr0ge/.

Chicago (17th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. "From Vision to Global Reality." IPv6 Czar’s Blog. September 20, 2025. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/from-vision-to-global-reality.html

Charles Sun. "From Vision to Global Reality." LinkedIn Pulse. September 20, 2025. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-vision-global-reality-charles-sun-hr0ge/


#InternationalDayOfPeace #PeaceDay #PeaceOnEarth #GlobalUnity #OneHumanFamily #TogetherForPeace #UNPeaceDay #WorldPeace #TechForGood #PeaceBuilders

Disclaimer: The views presented are only personal opinions and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Government.

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

 

๐Ÿ“Œ IEEE Plagiarism Case: 2020 Exposure → 2025 Escalation

 


© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

๐Ÿ”Ž Introduction

This page serves as the central record of the IEEE plagiarism case. It documents the original 2020 exposure, the 2025 escalation after institutional inaction, and the supporting forensic evidence.

The purpose is simple: to preserve the facts, ensure accountability, and provide a transparent record for colleagues, editors, and the global research community.


๐Ÿ“– 2020 Exposure

Key Visuals (2020 evidence):


⚖️ 2025 Escalation

Key Visuals (2025 evidence):

  • Key Findings Graphic (condensed highlights of the escalation):

  • Forensic Summary: Severity Counts and Categories:


๐Ÿ–ผ️ Forensic Documentation & Visuals

  • Timeline graphics (2020 → 2025):

  • Side‑by‑side comparisons of original vs. plagiarized text:


  • Campaign covers and banners for reference:









๐Ÿ“‚ Key Documents


๐Ÿ“ฃ Call to Action

Integrity in publishing depends on accountability.

  • Share this record with colleagues and networks.
  • Add your perspective on how institutions should respond when plagiarism is documented but ignored.
  • Help ensure that silence is not the standard.

๐Ÿ”— Navigation


Citation Formats for This Article:

APA (7th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. (2025, September 20). IEEE plagiarism case: 2020 exposure → 2025 escalation. IPv6 Czar's Blog. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/ieee-plagiarism-case-2020-exposure-2025.html

MLA (9th Edition) Citation
Sun, Charles. "IEEE Plagiarism Case: 2020 Exposure → 2025 Escalation." IPv6 Czar's Blog, 20 Sept. 2025, https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/ieee-plagiarism-case-2020-exposure-2025.html.

Chicago (17th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. "IEEE Plagiarism Case: 2020 Exposure → 2025 Escalation." IPv6 Czar’s Blog. September 20, 2025. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/ieee-plagiarism-case-2020-exposure-2025.html


© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.



Formal Complaint Letter to IEEE: Plagiarism in IoT Newsletter (September 14, 2025)

 

© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.


This is the full text of the formal complaint letter I submitted to IEEE on September 14, 2025. The letter set a deadline of September 19, 2025 for corrective action regarding documented plagiarism in the IEEE IoT Newsletter article. That deadline has now passed without response. To ensure transparency, I am publishing the letter here in full as part of the public record.


Date: September 14, 2025

Dear IEEE IoT Newsletter Editorial Board / Editor‑in‑Chief, IEEE Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Office, and IEEE Member Conduct/Ethics Committee (EMCC):

I am formally reporting clear, major plagiarism in the IEEE IoT Newsletter article “IPv6 and Internet of Things: Prospects for Latin America” (July 17, 2017). My detailed, line‑by‑line forensic review confirms that substantial portions are directly taken from my article, “No IoT Without IPv6” (ComputerWorld, May 19, 2016).

The attached, fully documented analysis identifies seven discrete, verifiable cases of plagiarism, summarized below:

#

Plagiarized Content (IEEE)

IEEE Location (Para)

Original Content (ComputerWorld)

CW Location (Para)

Type / Severity

1

“There is no IoT without IPv6.”

¶ 4 & Conclusions

“No IoT Without IPv6” (title); “…the IoT won’t be happening without IPv6.”

Title; Final ¶

Major — Verbatim slogan / core thesis

2

“IT experts predict that there will be over 50 billion ‘connected devices’ by 2020.”

¶ 2

“projected … more than 50 billion devices… by 2020.”

Reason 1, ¶ 2

Moderate — Paraphrased data / framing

3

“…IPv4 offers just under, 4.3 billion unique IP addresses. …IoT clearly needs more IP addresses…”

¶ 2

“IPv4 has only 4.3 billion possible IP addresses.”

Reason 1, ¶ 3

Moderate — Paraphrase, data & structure

4

“IPv6 extends… 128 bits (340 undecillion or 340 trillion trillion trillion)… for the next decades.”

¶ 3

“IPv6… 340 undecillion (that is 340 trillion trillion trillion) addresses…”

Reason 1, ¶ 6

Moderate — Numeric / phrase copying

5

“IPv6 is about vision, leadership, innovation and competitive edge.”

¶ 4

“Adopting IPv6 is a matter of leadership, vision and competitive edge.”

Reason 5, opening line

Major — Verbatim, central argument

6

Framing of Vint Cerf as an authority on IPv4 as “experimental” / IPv6 “production”

¶ 1 (lead); thematic

“…Vint Cerf… IPv4 is only ‘the experimental version…’ IPv6… actual production version…”

Reason 4

Major — Analytical / research misappropriation; concealed citation

7

“the IoT market will generate between $6 to 10 trillion a year by 2025”

¶ 6

“…the IoT represents at least a $6 trillion opportunity.”

Reason 5, final ¶

Major — Direct paraphrase; concealed source / data theft

All instances are supported with direct URL links, precise contextual quotations, and severity designations based on IEEE’s Plagiarism Policy, COPE Guidelines, and the Harvard Guide. This is not incidental overlap or public‑domain reuse — these are central technical, business, and interpretive claims, unique to my work, presented without attribution.

Required Actions — to be completed or formally scheduled no later than Friday, September 19, 2025:

  1. Immediate retraction of the offending IEEE IoT Newsletter article.
  2. Formal public acknowledgment of the plagiarism and an apology.
  3. Publication of a corrective notice describing the process undertaken and the standards now in place to prevent recurrence.
  4. Notification to all venues where this article or its content has been used, citing the retraction and reason.

If I do not receive confirmation of these actions or a binding resolution timeline by the stated deadline, I will proceed to take further steps to protect my work and the public record, supported by the complete forensic evidence package.

Please confirm receipt of this complaint immediately and provide the name and contact information of the individual responsible for the investigation. I am available to supply further documentation as needed.

Respectfully,

Charles Sun

Attachment:

Forensic Analysis Report - Plagiarism in IEEE IoT Newsletter Article 20250914

Citation Formats for This Article:

APA (7th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. (2025, September 14). Formal complaint letter to IEEE: Plagiarism in IoT Newsletter. IPv6 Czar's Blog. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/formal-complaint-letter-to-ieee.html

MLA (9th Edition) Citation
Sun, Charles. "Formal Complaint Letter to IEEE: Plagiarism in IoT Newsletter." IPv6 Czar's Blog, 14 Sept. 2025, https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/formal-complaint-letter-to-ieee.html.

Chicago (17th Edition) Citation
Charles Sun. "Formal Complaint Letter to IEEE: Plagiarism in IoT Newsletter." IPv6 Czar’s Blog. September 14, 2025. https://ipv6czar.blogspot.com/2025/09/formal-complaint-letter-to-ieee.html


Disclaimer: The views presented are only personal opinions and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Government.

#PlagiarismExposed #PublishingEthics #IEEEAccountability #ForensicDocumentation #IntellectualIntegrity #NoIoTWithoutIPv6 #CitationMatters #TechTransparency #DataMisuse #CharlesSunReports






© 2025 Charles Sun. All rights reserved.